Showing posts with label parity. Show all posts
Showing posts with label parity. Show all posts

Monday, October 21, 2013

MLB Fall Classic: Average event in a Golden package - Part one


MLB Fall Classic: Average event in a Golden package - Part one
by Dan Salem and Todd Salem (10-21-13)



TODD:
Game One of the 2013 MLB World Series is Wednesday night. The Boston Red Sox will be facing the St. Louis Cardinals. Woo? Not quite a surprise match-up this season; no one really came out of nowhere. Even both LCS match-ups were between powerful franchises. Unless you count the Red Sox going from worst to first as surprising, this year's playoffs was pretty bland. And even Boston's uprising was semi-faulty. They shouldn't have been that bad last year. They had the same roster but with some of the Dodgers' players. And look how far LA got with Adrian Gonzalez being arguably their best hitter all year.

We all know MLB struggles for TV ratings. Is it better that they've gotten a World Series between two country-wide teams? Everyone says they love the underdog stories of the Rays and Athletics and Pirates but then the public doesn't show up to watch these teams when it counts. Baseball has, even without a salary cap, one of the most parity-filled sports in this country. The Red Sox going from worst to first in the regular season isn't even a story because it has happened multiple times before. Parity is not an issue here as far as fair and balanced play. But is parity an issue for league popularity?

The NBA gets ratings when the Lakers, Celtics, Heat, etc. are playing for a title. Luckily for them, this happens nearly every season. You know when the last time neither the Lakers, Celtics or LeBron were in the NBA Finals? It hasn't happened since 2006. And if you throw the Spurs in this group, 2006 doubles as the only NBA Finals since Jordan's Bulls that didn't have one of those teams.

Where are these teams for MLB? Instead of "boring" match-ups between the same teams every year, baseball gets new blood in the World Series nearly every season. And yet this ends up badly for their viewership.

What can be done to save the Fall Classic?


DAN:
I'm not quite sure how it happened, but baseball became a sport where it is harder and harder to watch any old team compete for a championship. The NFL has parity, loves parity, and as a fan I'll watch most of the playoff games and certainly the Super Bowl, no matter who is playing. The NBA needs its powerhouses, has them, and I'll watch the finals when the powerhouses are in it. They usually are. MLB is different. It has parity, a lot of it, but I do NOT enjoy watching random teams play for a title. It was not fun for anyone outside of San Francisco to see the Giants win it all last season. MLB also has powerhouses, teams that are good year after year. But I did NOT enjoy watching them compete in the League Championship Series' this season. Its hard to watch and enjoy the Red Sox, as a Yankee fan, but the NLCS between the Dodgers and Cardinals should have been awesome. On paper it reads like two great franchises battling for a shot at the World Series, but you're spot on with your MLB analysis. The Fall Classic is broken and the Red Sox vs. Cardinals is lacking cache that would surely be there in both the NFL and NBA.

I actually think parity has hurt the popularity of MLB. I love watching my Yankees and will watch them in every playoff game if possible. But outside of my home team, I don't need to watch the games. Checking the scores is just as much fun. The games are long, so why not tune in for an hour? Well there's no guarantee anything at all will happen during those three innings. Watch one quarter of an NFL game or an NBA game and you're practically guaranteed scoring. Baseball doesn't work that way, so its needs matchups to make it exciting. A great hitter vs. a great pitcher. But outside of the Dodgers lineup, there's only a few hitters that make me take notice. The Red Sox have one in David Ortiz. The Tigers have one in Miguel Cabrera, but they're now out. The Cardinals don't have anyone who quite reaches this level. Where does this leave us? With a Fall Classic that's sorely lacking.

I like the NBA Finals because one of the teams you mentioned, or more importantly one of the Super Stars of the league, has been playing for the title nearly every season in the last decade. I love the Super Bowl because its always exciting and football never lacks for story lines. But I'm at a loss for the World Series. They usually get fresh blood in the Fall Classic, which is ultimately great for regular season baseball but kills October excitement once your team is out of the running. This year is different, or at least it should be with two classic franchises holding strong in October.

The Red Sox move from worst to first should be a huge story. I actually think its pretty amazing. They stunk last season, basically ran out the same roster with a new manager this year and are now the best of the American League. Sure, sure, they weren't bad in 2011. But they STUNK last year in 2012. I actually picked them to follow things up with a bleak 2013, barely squeaking into the playoffs. So I don't get why this isn't a bigger story. Probably because its the Red Sox, they've been great for a decade more or less and ho hum.

Ultimately it comes down to Star Power. Baseball doesn't have enough. Its lacking, missing, non existent for me outside of David Ortiz who doesn't even play in the field. Teams need stars to draw fans outside their home market. MLB has a marketing problem. We need more KIA car commercials with baseball players. Come on!





Friday, December 7, 2012

NFL Parity, where Anyone can Win - Part Two



NFL Parity, where Anyone can Win - Part Two
by Dan Salem and Todd Salem (12-7-12)
[Part One]


TODD: 
Clearly, saying Andy Reid is saying enough. But outside of the fat and the mustachio and the Venn diagram where they cross, nothing else in the NFL is known and fans need things to bank on, to keep them sane. Upsets are grand and having the playoff picture muddled for two and a half months is fine, but where is the constant?

Remember that guy from Lost, the one traveling through time... Desmond. Remember how Desmond needed a constant to keep from going crazy (or dying or something)? Well, without a point of reference there's no basis of understanding to the NFL. If any team can go from last to first and vice versa, how are fans supposed to relate and find meaning in the games? Football then goes from a sport with rooting interest to a spectacle with random outcomes.

There is no dumber bet in sports than the preseason predictions of NFL division winners. I need my constant.

DAN:
I'm glad we both agree on Andy Reid.  And your Lost analogy is a good one, but I do think there are plenty of constants in the NFL for fans to use to stay sane. Yes, teams can go from worst to first, but this is a good thing. However, there are about five teams in the last five to seven years that have always been good, and about five teams that have always been awful.

This constant is more than enough to keep fans sane. This season has thrown a wrench into the whole machine, I can't argue with that, as the usually solid teams have been losing games that one would think they never would. I attribute this to defense and the changing game (a la rules and coaching) more than the unpredictability of how good a team is. The Patriots, Ravens, Steelers, Packers, and Giants have all been good to great for the last five seasons easily. I think by the end of this year they will all have winning records to stand on. And as for the bad teams, well the Browns and Chiefs may stand alone this season, but the Lions, Rams, and Cardinals all are pretty awful on average too.

I find the NFL has lots of constants and I'm thrilled that one team’s victory over another isn't one of them.  Unless we are talking about the Giants over the Patriots of course.

TODD:
It seems like revisionist history to label teams as consistently good for a five year span. Both the Giants and Packers sneaked into the playoffs the years they won the Superbowl. And they each had seasons recently where they missed the playoffs, the Packers finishing 6-10 as recently as 2008. The AFC squads you mentioned have been more dependable (although I'm not sure who is truly elite this season). Really the turnover in the NFL is the only reliable thing.

Each year divisions flip, playoff teams lose double digit games and bottom dwellers jump up to respectability.  If the NFL has one constant it is in its ability to be consistently not constant and I find that rather disconcerting.  A stronger word might be depressing or eye gouging.

DAN:
I can't disagree with that, although I want to.  But I'm definitely not depressed.  The NFL is entertainment, a crazy flip flop league that makes so much money from gambling that its in everyone but the fan's best interest to be crazy and flip floppy.  Embrace the chaos.  Anything completely unpredictable will always be entertaining.






Link to header Image

Monday, December 3, 2012

NFL Parity, where Anyone can Win






Welcome to Seesaw Sports!

Welcome to Seesaw Sports, where two brothers from New York jaw back and forth about the hottest sports topics today.  Todd Salem and Dan Salem take turns 'discussing' (read argue) a topic, with each exchange of words spanning two to three posts.

Mondays and Fridays the sports seesaw is here.  On to topic number one.  Enjoy!



NFL Parity, where Anyone can Win
by Dan Salem and Todd Salem (12-3-12) 
[Part Two]
 

TODD:   
The NFL is ridiculous.  People claim that parity in the sport is awesome, that nothing is better than a team being able to win ‘Any Given Sunday.’  I call bullshit.  The NFL has become a parody (see what I did there?).  If there's no rhyme or reason to what happens in the games, then the sport becomes inexplicable.  Rather than being excited for upsets to occur, we are left to wonder if any team truly ever has an advantage other than the fact that no one believes in them. 

Seriously, what's more important to a team winning on Sundays:   Having a star quarterback or having no one believe they can win? 

The reason people love March Madness so much is because the upsets come in waves, and then by round three or four, we are usually left with some good teams to watch battle for the title.  In years where the Cinderella goes a bit too far, popularity and ratings drop.  No one wants to see that in the Elite Eight.   

The NFL has become just a continuous round of thirty two where anyone can win any game and, after a while, even buzzer beaters become monotonous.



DAN:   
Love the parity in the NFL and it’s definitely more important to have "no one believe you can win."  Playing the “nobody believes in us” card won the NY Giants two Superbowls and the Green Bay Packers one.  Both of those teams do have star quarterbacks, but on a weekly basis in the NFL, playing with your back to wall inspires the entire team and creates wins even when your quarterback is barely above average.  For example, the Ravens.

Definitely love the parity in the league though.  Its completely unpredictable!  It used to be that by week four, week five at the latest, you knew who all the good teams were and could probably envision the playoff picture.  But for at least three seasons now that is completely wrong.  And its amazing!  We need to keep watching, must watch, in order to even figure out who is good in the league.  Plus, any random game can be super awesome and exciting to watch when it comes down to the final two minutes or overtime, which has happened a ton this season by the way.  

Now we have to wait until week ten to see what teams are legit and who may or may not shake out.  The top five teams have distanced themselves and the bottom ten are out of it.  I love this aspect!  And how can you possibly hate on it? 

Its this exact situation that won your team, the Giants, a championship last year.  And its this phenomena that has kept me, as a Jets fan, glued to every game week after week for the last three seasons.  You don't have to go 11-5 to win in the playoffs, and this season you might only need a 9-7 record to get in or win your division.  

The talent is evenly dispersed more so than ever before and personally I love seeing a "talented" team like the Cowboys squander a victory because of poor coaching.  Or Andy Reid.  Andy Reid! 

Enough said.